A Reading Life

January 31, 2007 at 3:56 pm | In Alberto Manuel, Anna Quindlen, reading life | Leave a Comment

Manguel, A. (1996). A History of Reading. NY: Viking Press.

Quindlen, A. (1998). How Reading Changed My Life. NY: Ballantine Books.

 To understand the reader’s perspective on genres, it’s useful to explore the historical and cultural context of reading. In doing so, I was transported for hours browsing my library’s surprisingly large selection of books about books, reading and readers.  There was a missionary zeal in these works, especially those penned by noted authors. These memoir-style accounts were lush with anecdotes detailing how both the simple act of reading and what they read transformed their lives.

quindlen2.jpgAnna Quindlen’s best seller How Reading Changed My Life (1998) is my favorite book on this subject.  In her free-flowing, engaging essay style, Quindlen describes her discovery of Reader’s Digest Condensed Books  and its revelation of possibilities. She discovered that reading could offer freedom, sustenance and companionship.  She deftly interweaves her personal stories with comments on attitudes toward reading expressed in American popular culture. She observes (p 9) “a certain hale and heartiness that is suspicious of reading as anything more than a tool for advancement”.  Her comments about reading groups , about censorship and about women reading resonated with me. 

manuel.gifMy reactions to another best-selling reading memoir, Alberto Manuel’s A History of Reading (1996) are decidedly mixed by comparison. I enjoyed dipping into Manuel’s chapters and sampling his historical anecdotes. However, I feel the title is a vast overpromise versus the wandering, idiosyncratic text he delivers. What Manuel does best is discuss how previous experience will influence how each reader interprets a text.  Manuel’s book is similar to Quindlen’s in that it celebrates the intimacy and the reader’s  freedom to create and recreate meaning . Another highlight was his chapter “Reading within Walls” which explores genre reading stereotypes, personalized by his embarrassment at buying “the pink covered book”. 

Blog Post about Sidekicks

January 30, 2007 at 6:36 am | In Lipstick Chronicles, pop culture, sidekicks | 1 Comment

nancy-drew.jpgMy first online search for information on literary sidekicks led me to a January 5, 2007 blog post and lively discussion (120+ comments) on the Lipstick Chronicles Blog. 

The originator of the post, Rebecca the Bookseller, reflects that sidekicks fulfill an important literary function as the reader’s proxy. The sidekick can be counted upon to pose “the bumbling questions that need to be asked” for the reader to solve a murder mystery. In chick lit novels, you expect the sassy girlfriend to serve alternately as a confidante and as a humorous foil to the heroine’s emotional upheavals. Rebecca poses an intriguing question in her blog: Why are there so few female sidekicks? I did a mental rundown of some female sidekicks from mysteries:  

         Detective               ”Sidekick”_____

  • Nancy Drew           Bess and George
  • Stephanie Plum       Lula 
  • Inspector Lynley      Barbara  Havers 

Based on the above, I would agree that these supporting female characters  are better described as partners, or part of an ensemble. I will revisit this  question as I read across genres to confirm whether my first intuition holds up.  It may be that the “sidekick as clueless tagalong” is endearing when it’s a guy, but not so much if it’s a female chum who’s the comic foil.  

What also impressed me, in perusing the blog comments, was how quickly the exchange moved from literary to pop culture sidekicks. When asked to propose favorite sidekicks, there was a flurry of posts once the possibility of listing TV and cartoon sidekicks was floated.  You could feel the energy –the delight–of recounting classic pop culture match-ups like Yogi Bear and Boo Boo, or Andy Griffith and Barney Fife.  

From these blog suggestions, I’ve assembled a preliminary list of mystery sidekicks and sci fi/fantasy sidekicks. It appears that finding sidekicks in horror and the other genres will be more challenging.

What is popular culture?

January 25, 2007 at 11:40 am | In John Storey, celebrity, pop culture, social networking | 2 Comments

pop.jpgJohn Storey, in his 1998 critical treatise, An Introduction to Cultural Theory and Popular Culture, presents six definitions of popular culture. Storey’s definitions span the landscape of philosophical concepts from structuralism to hegemony to mass appeal.          

 My “pop culture” definition includes objects, persons ,events and practices  with commercial appeal and broad visibility among “the masses”. It is culture which is light, transient, disposable. In contrast, “high culture” is intellectually challenging and therefore exclusive. Storey suggests that pop culture should be viewed in context, as residual or other culture: what’s left after legitimate culture stakes the high ground. I disagree. With contemporary American culture’s focus on sound bites and “dumbing down” information , it is “high culture” that is becoming the marginalized,other culture.     

The hectic pace of life today blurs distinctions between home and work, community and individual to cope with information overload. This tendency to synthesize and simplify has made “pop culture”  more important to everyday life in my opinion. Pop culture offers a touchstone–a communication shorthand– for connecting with others. Take a quick look at the postings on  social networking sites like Myspace. How often do members define their identity in terms of their pop culture likes and dislikes?

In this era of infotainment, popular culture has expanded to include these areas:

  • Entertainment (movies, music, TV/cable shows, art),
  • Information (TV news, books, magazines, newspapers)
  • Advertising
  • Celebrity  (who’s hot/not)
  • Personal Technology (internet, videogames, cell phones)
  • Appearance (Beauty, fashion and décor)
  • Leisure/ Lifestyle (sports and hobbies)
  • Celebrations and social practices (holidays, traditions)    

   While pop culture, by its frothy nature, is apolitical, it can embrace normative social views. Two examples which spring to mind are the “reduce/reuse/recycle” mantra and the pressure for “politically correct” language and behavior.  What should we conclude about American society today that equates popular culture with trivia and game show savvy?

Sidekicks as genre theme

January 22, 2007 at 11:00 am | In Genreflecting, Novelist, sidekick | Leave a Comment

One thrust for this online journal will be to explore the role of the ”sidekick”  in various genres. In dictionaries and encyclopedias, the sidekick is defined as a friend or companion who supports the activities of a heroic main character.

holmes1.jpgFor my analysis, “sidekick” is defined by Random House’s Dictionary.com:

  1. 1. A close friend and helper- (Ron Weasley, Dr. Watson, Jughead) ;
  2. 2.  A confederate or assistant (Archie Goodwin, Sancho Panza) 

 I prefer this dual-facet definition because it recognizes that, while a sidekick is always a hero’s confidante and helper, he or she can be either a social peer or a hired hand /subordinate.  This adds a complexity to the interpersonal dynamics that I find fascinating. The cinematic sidekick is allowed to express emotions, to be lovably imperfect and funny, to humanize and contrast with the stoic, driven hero. It will be interesting to explore how literary sidekicks add texture to genre works. 

Since I’m a novice genre reader, I’m assuming that it will be straightforward to identify one or two primary sidekicks in a novel. I don’t intend to analyze all the secondary characters. There is also latitude to include variations such as animal sidekicks (Braun’s cat detective) or alien sidekicks (Chewbacca). But, can a blood relative be a sidekick? 

As a start, I’ve tagged some cross-genre titles in Novelist using the keyword “sidekick”. I plan to check Genreflecting to identify sidekicks as a theme .  I’ve also found a link from Wikipedia to a list of literary sidekicks (genres unspecified). 

What is your reading history?

January 21, 2007 at 10:00 am | In genre fiction, librarian, non-fiction, reading history | Leave a Comment

girl-reading.jpgMy family swears that my head was perpetually in a book from ages 4 to 14. My two earliest memories are of Golden Book bedtime stories with my dad, and of receiving my first mail: monthly books from Dr. Seuss’s book club. The prized possession of my childhood book collection was an illustrated encyclopedia set from A&P supermarket. I suspect my current preference for non-fiction traces back to hours spent pouring over the garish color drawings and text in those spare volumes.  

I discovered the Little House on the Prairie books in third grade( age 8). These books were a portal to an alternative universe for a city kid whose artsy parents thought a field trip was only a visit to the Met. I’d bike to the park, sit under a tree, and be transported, captivated by the challenges of frontier life.I raced through the series in about a year, and remember being dejected when I ran out of books to read. I think I switched to Nancy Drew  mysteries then, which propelled me through elementary school.

Next came an obsession with comic books, particularly Mad magazine and the Archie series. I never got interested in superhero or science fiction comics, but I did turn to science fiction stories and novellas during the early high school years. I gravitated toward Harlan Ellison, Philip Jose Farmer and Isaac Asimov. I recall that I didn’t care much for LeGuin-style fantasy/sci fi works.

In middle school, I enjoyed the Austen and Bronte classics, but this interest in historical romance led only to a dalliance with Georgette Heyer novels in 8-9th grade. In 9th grade, I read Gone with the Wind, after which other romances paled by comparison, so I gave them up. As a high school junior, I read a lot of existential and absurdist works by authors such as Kafka, Ionesco, Brecht and Beckett.  Starting in college, I stopped reading fiction altogether for over two decades, though this wasn’t a conscious decision at the time. Instead, I watched a lot of movies, some TV, listened to music and read the occasional essay, magazine, short story or non-fiction best seller. My husband wasn’t a pleasure reader in those days, so it seemed anti-social to read during a precious hour or two of free time.  

Even today, as a librarian-in-training, I feel guilty “reading for pleasure” unless I’m on vacation, killing time or required to read for a class. For a free read, I’ll peruse a magazine or seek a  best-selling non-fiction book of travel, psychology, popular culture, technology or science. I confess to enjoying a good “chick lit” or “cozy mystery” as a way to unwind after a grueling day.

Blog at WordPress.com. | Theme: Pool by Borja Fernandez.
Entries and comments feeds.